Pharmacology

mod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_counter
mod_vvisit_counterToday5540
mod_vvisit_counterYesterday9043
mod_vvisit_counterThis week27422
mod_vvisit_counterLast week53012
mod_vvisit_counterThis month149233
mod_vvisit_counterLast month268832
mod_vvisit_counterAll days3652161

We have: 138 guests, 15 bots online
Your IP: 67.202.9.192
 , 
Today: Jun 19, 2013

JoomlaWatch Agent

Visitors hit counter, stats, email report, location on a map, SEO for Joomla, Wordpress, Drupal, Magento and Prestashop

JoomlaWatch Users

JoomlaWatch Visitors



57.1%United States United States
12.1%United Kingdom United Kingdom
5.6%Canada Canada
5.6%Australia Australia
3.4%Netherlands Netherlands
1.9%India India
1.5%Germany Germany
1.1%France France
1.1%Ireland Ireland
0.9%Philippines Philippines

Today: 142
Yesterday: 313
This Week: 799
Last Week: 2133
This Month: 5568
Last Month: 24906
Total: 51061


CAPITOL HILL FORUM REPORT PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Grey Literature - DPF: Drug Policy Letter spring 1995
Written by Drug Policy Foundation   
Saturday, 22 April 1995 00:00

On Friday March 10, DPF brought top researchers and advocates to Capitol Hill to make the case for needle exchange programs. The event was preceded by a week's worth of national publicity DPF generated by leaking suppressed government documents about needle exchanges to the media. Government officials, congressional staffers, activists and reporters packed the room in the Rayburn House Office Building to hear about the issue.

A key issue at the forum was the question of whether the federal government should fund existing needle exchange programs and provide start-up money to new programs.

dpf9507

Currently, federal funding is banned unless health agencies find that the programs curb HIV's spread and do not increase drug use. Evidence supporting both conclusions has built steadily, and in late 1993, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said the feds should fund the programs. Unfortunately, that recommendation–along with other health agenices' comments on needle exchange research – was kept secret until DPF leaked it March 7.

The CDC was motivated to take its pro-needle exchange position by the most thorough research on the topic ever undertaken: A federally funded study by University of California researchers. Among other things, that study showed four different ways in which needle exchanges are likely to reduce HIV transmission. Also, the UC study found no evidence that the programs increase drug use in their communities or among their clients.

dpf9508

To explain his findings, DPF brought the lead researcher from the study, Dr. Peter Lurie of UC San Francisco, to Washington. Also on the forum program were Yale University professor Edward Kaplan, who designed an award-winning method for measuring needle exchange's impact on HIV transmission, and Ernie Drucker, a DPF board member with more than 20 years' experience in harm reduction programs. The program was rounded out by the Washington, D.C., premiere of "Fire in Our House," a new 10-minute video on needle exchanges produced by Vanessa Vadim and Rory Kennedy of MayDay Media.

Copies of a videotape of the forum, which includes "Fire in Our House," are available for $35 from DPF.The MayDay Media video is also available separately for $15, and includes a resource guide and other information. It is also available through DPF.

 

Our valuable member Drug Policy Foundation has been with us since Monday, 20 February 2012.

Show Other Articles Of This Author