|
***********************************************************************
DRUGSENSE WEEKLY
***********************************************************************
DrugSense Weekly,            March 13, 2008                      #591
Read This Publication On-line at:Â http://www.drugsense.org/current.htm
------------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
* This Just In
  (1) State May Take Over Growing Medical Pot
  (2) Choice Of Drug Czar Indicates Focus On Treatment, Not Jail
  (3) Fears In U.S. Drug War Will Destabilize Mexico
  (4) War on Drugs 'Has Enriched Cartels'
* Weekly News in Review
Drug Policy-
  (5) U.S. Should Make Mexican Drug Violence A Priority, Lawmaker Says
  (6) Mexican Cartels Infiltrate Houston
  (7) Mexican Cartels Plague Atlanta
  (8) Column: Legal Drugs: The Only Route To Ending Mexican Violence
Law Enforcement & Prisons-
  (9) New Look at Sentencing Guidelines for Cocaine
  (10) Prosecutor: Ex-MSU Football Star's Release From Prison Raises Concerns
  (11) Drug Arrests Shock Linden's Residents
  (12) Ombudsman Widens Probe Into Garda Drug Collusion
Cannabis & Hemp-
  (13) U.S. Should Lift Ban On Hemp
  (14) California Marijuana Dispensaries Cheer U.S. Shift On Raids
  (15) Putting Pot Under The Microscope
  (16) California Can't Afford To Legalize Marijuana
International News-
  (17) This Is A Coca Leaf, Not Cocaine, Insists Morales
  (18) We Can't Go On Prohibiting Drugs!
  (19) Poll Finds Most Back Legal Pot, Gang Crackdown
  (20) Ottawa Follows U.S.-Style Approach In War On Drugs
  (21) How To Make Me Shut Up About Legalizing Drugs
* Hot Off The 'Net
  Fear Prevails At The UN As Voices For Drug Law Reform Are Smeared
  Police Detective Says Legalize Drugs To Stop Gangs
  The President And The Drug War: Part I / Al Giordano
  Obama's Drug Policy / John Tierney
  Lawyers For Prof. Craker Submit Supplemental Motion To The DEA
  Meeting In Vienna
  Bruce Mirken On The Rachel Maddow Show
  Drug Truth Network
  Obama Signals Readiness To Further Militarize Drug War
  "Maybe Marijuana Should Be Legalized & Regulated" Congresswoman Sanchez
  Cannabidiol Now! / By Fred Gardner
* What You Can Do This Week
  Al Roker Reporting - Marijuana Inc.
  Staying Alive - CBC's The Fifth Estate
* Letter Of The Week
  Legalize Drugs And Gangs Will Go Away / Travis Erbacher
* Letter Writer Of The Month - February
  Dan Linn
* Feature Article
  The Drug War Is Not A Failure / Pete Guither
* Quote of the Week
  David Talbot
DrugSense needs your support to continue this newsletter and many
other important projects - see how you can help at
http://www.drugsense.org/donate.htm
***********************************************************************
THIS JUST IN
=======================================================================
(1) STATE MAY TAKE OVER GROWING MEDICAL POT
Pubdate: Thu, 12 Mar 2009
Source: Statesman Journal (Salem, OR)
Copyright: 2009 Statesman Journal
Author: Tracy Loew
Lawmakers Say House Bill Would Improve Public Safety
The state would take over growing and distributing marijuana to
patients in the medical-marijuana program under a bill introduced in
the Legislature on Wednesday.
"Our current system isn't working, and we need to move quickly to
protect patient safety," said Rep. Ron Maurer, R-Grants Pass.
House Bill 3274 directs the state to establish and operate a
marijuana production facility and distribute the drug to pharmacies
for dispensing to cardholders and primary caregivers. The bill
imposes a $98-per-ounce tax on marijuana, which would cover the
state's costs of operating and securing the production center.
Lawmakers said they think the bill would improve public safety by
eliminating private medical-marijuana grow sites.
Some private growers have been accused of illegally selling
marijuana to noncardholders, and other sites have been targeted by
burglaries and home invasions.
"House Bill 3274 takes medical marijuana off the streets and into a
safer and more secure environment," said Rep. Chris Harker,
D-Beaverton.
[snip]
Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09/n296/a04.html
===
(2) CHOICE OF DRUG CZAR INDICATES FOCUS ON TREATMENT, NOT JAIL
Pubdate: Thu, 12 Mar 2009
Source: Washington Post (DC)
Copyright: 2009 The Washington Post Company
Author: Carrie Johnson, and Amy Goldstein
The White House yesterday said that it will push for treatment,
rather than incarceration, of people arrested for drug-related
crimes as it announced the nomination of Seattle Police Chief R. Gil
Kerlikowske to oversee the nation's effort to control illegal drugs.
The choice of drug czar and the emphasis on alternative drug courts,
announced by Vice President Biden, signal a sharp departure from
Bush administration policies, gravitating away from cutting the
supply of illicit drugs from foreign countries and toward curbing
drug use in communities across the United States.
Biden, who helped shape the Office of National Drug Control Policy
as a U.S. senator in the 1980s, said the Obama administration would
continue to focus on the southwest border, where Mexican authorities
are facing thousands of drug-related murders and unchecked violence
from drug cartels moving cocaine, heroin and methamphetamine into
American markets. But it remained unclear how the new administration
would engineer its budget to tackle the problem.
Since President Richard Nixon first declared a war on drugs nearly
four decades ago, the government has spent billions of dollars with
mixed results, according to independent studies and drug policy
scholars. In recent years, the number of high-school-age children
abusing illegal substances has dipped, but marijuana use has inched
upward, and drug offenders continue to flood the nation's courts.
"The success of our efforts to reduce the flow of drugs is largely
dependent on our ability to reduce demand for them," Kerlikowske
said yesterday at a ceremony attended by his former law enforcement
colleagues. "Our nation's drug problem is one of human suffering,
and as a police officer but also in my own family, I have
experienced the effects that drugs can have."
Kerlikowske's adult stepson, Jeffrey, has been arrested in the past
on drug charges, an issue that the police chief referenced in his
remarks yesterday.
[snip]
Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09/n296/a08.html
===
(3) FEARS IN U.S. DRUG WAR WILL DESTABILIZE MEXICO
Pubdate: Thu, 12 Mar 2009
Source: San Francisco Chronicle (CA)
Copyright: 2009 Hearst Communications Inc.
Author: Carolyn Lochhead
WASHINGTON - -- Concern about a potential failed state - not
Pakistan, not Somalia, but California's neighbor Mexico - is
mounting in Washington as an all-out war involving 45,000 Mexican
military personnel fails to quell rising drug violence that is
spilling from such Mexican cities as Tijuana into the United States.
An estimated 6,290 drug-related murders occurred in Mexico last
year, six times the standard definition of a civil war, said Vanda
Felbab-Brown, a leading scholar on the issue at the Brookings
Institution.
Rep. Mike Thompson, D-St. Helena, a member of the House Intelligence
Committee, described beheadings of Mexican mayors and police chiefs
and said Mexican drug gangs have infiltrated the cannabis fields on
both public and private lands in Northern California. He said
Mexican villagers are kidnapped and smuggled into the northern
coastal forests to grow pot, leaving environmental wreckage in their
wake.
He said a timber company employee had been held at gunpoint by a
Mexican gang, and he worried that hikers could be threatened. There
also have been gang confrontations with firefighters.
"This isn't your '60s hippie growing a little pot on the back 40 to
get through winter," Thompson said.
Two House committees will hold hearings today, and Sen. Dianne
Feinstein, D-Calif., has scheduled a Senate hearing for Tuesday to
determine how to respond. Ideas range from building a stronger
border fence to decriminalizing marijuana.
[snip]
Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09/n296/a09.html
===
(4) WAR ON DRUGS 'HAS ENRICHED CARTELS'
Pubdate: Thu, 12 Mar 2009
Source: Independent (UK)
Copyright: 2009 Independent Newspapers (UK) Ltd.
Author: Toby Green, in Vienna
Campaigners Criticise Draft Paper for Not Including Harm Reduction
Tactics
United Nations member states are set to paper over their differences
today and sign up to 10 more years of the much-criticised "war on
drugs" at a drugs summit in Vienna. A draft policy declaration
tabled at the UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs last night did not
mention the innovation that campaigners had hoped for: "harm
reduction" strategies such as needle exchange programmes to prevent
the spread of HIV, or even legalisation and regulation to help erode
the power of traffickers and drug lords.
The summit comes in the wake of high-profile indictments of the UN's
drug strategy. A European Commission report published on Tuesday
said the strategy had not made any progress in cutting supply and
demand.
Antonio Maria Costa, the executive director of the UN Office on
Drugs and Crime, said that "measurable progress" had been made.
Opening the Vienna talks, he said addiction to illicit drugs had
"stabilised" in the past few years but admitted that a "dramatic
unintended consequence" of the battle to stamp out the illicit trade
was that drug cartels had become so rich they could destabilise
impoverished and vulnerable nations in Africa and South America.
"When mafias can buy elections, candidates, political parties, in a
word, power, the consequences can only be highly destabilising" he
said.
"While ghettoes burn, West Africa is under attack [by Latin American
traffickers transporting cocaine to Europe], drug cartels threaten
Central America and drug money penetrates bankrupt financial
institutions".
[snip]
Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09/n295/a08.html
***********************************************************************
WEEKLY NEWS IN REVIEW
=======================================================================
Domestic News- Policy
----------------------------------
COMMENT: (5-8)
U.S. authorities are sounding more distressed in their call for
protecting the U.S.-Mexico border from drug cartels. One U.S. Rep.
recently suggested that trouble there is more significant for the
U.S. than trouble in Afghanistan. Other reports continue to suggest
that the Mexican cartels are already well-established north of the
border. Finally, at least one analyst sees a real solution.
===
(5) U.S. SHOULD MAKE MEXICAN DRUG VIOLENCE A PRIORITY, LAWMAKER SAYS
Pubdate: Wed, 11 Mar 2009
Source: San Diego Union Tribune (CA)
Copyright: 2009 Union-Tribune Publishing Co.
WASHINGTON - A top Republican lawmaker criticized the Defense
Department yesterday for not making the drug violence in Mexico as
big a priority as Afghanistan and for not coordinating U.S.
resources to confront it.
Rep. Jerry Lewis, R-Redlands, told the Associated Press that the
Mexican turmoil is "a lot more important, in my own judgment, than
Afghanistan at this moment."
He added: "We need to raise this to a higher level."
Lewis praised the Homeland Security Department for deploying
unmanned aerial vehicles to track human activity along the
U.S.-Mexico border, but he criticized the Pentagon for not providing
helicopters to help patrol it.
You can't chase these people around in trucks," said Lewis, the
ranking Republican on the House Appropriations Committee.
[snip]
Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09/n293/a07.html
===
(6) MEXICAN CARTELS INFILTRATE HOUSTON
Pubdate: Sat, 07 Mar 2009
Source: Houston Chronicle (TX)
Copyright: 2009 Houston Chronicle Publishing Company Division, Hearst
Newspaper
Author: Dane Schiller
Recent Arrests In A Mistaken Killing Point To The Perilous Presence
Of Gangs
The order was clear: Kill the guy in the Astros jersey.
But in a case of mistaken identity, Jose Perez ended up dead. The
intended target -- the Houston-based head of a Mexican drug cartel
cell pumping millions of dollars of cocaine into the city -- walked
away.
Perez, 27, was just a working guy, out getting dinner late on a
Friday with his wife and young children at Chilos, a seafood
restaurant on the Gulf Freeway.
His murder and the assassination gone awry point to the perilous
presence of Mexican organized crime and how cartel violence has
seeped into the city.
Arrests came in December when police and federal agents got a break
in the 2006 shooting as they charted the relationship and rivalries
between at least five cartel cells operating in Houston. A rogue's
gallery of about 100 names and mug shots taken at Texas jails and
morgues offers a blueprint for Mexican organized crime.
[snip]
Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09/n280/a06.html
===
(7) MEXICAN CARTELS PLAGUE ATLANTA
Pubdate: Mon, 9 Mar 2009
Source: USA Today (US)
Copyright: 2009 USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Co. Inc
Authors: Larry Copeland and Kevin Johnson, USA TODAY
Justice Dept. Says City Is Main Drug-Trafficking Center for All of
the Eastern U.S.
ATLANTAÂ --Â In a city where Coca Cola, United Parcel Service and Home
Depot are the titans of industry, there are new powerful forces on
the block: Mexican drug cartels.
Their presence and ruthless tactics are largely unknown to most
here. Yet, of the 195 U.S. cities where Mexican drug-trafficking
organizations are operating, federal law enforcement officials say
Atlanta has emerged as the new gateway to the troubled Southwest
border.
Rival drug cartels, the same violent groups warring in Mexico for
control of routes to lucrative U.S. markets, have established
Atlanta as the principal distribution center for the entire eastern
U.S., according to the Justice Department's National Drug
Intelligence Center.
In fiscal year 2008, federal drug authorities seized more
drug-related cash in Atlanta -- about $70 million -- than any other
region in the country, Drug Enforcement Administration ( DEA )
records show.
This year, more than $30 million has been intercepted in the Atlanta
area -- far more than the $19 million in Los Angeles and $18 million
in Chicago.
[snip]
Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09/n283/a09.html
===
(8) COLUMN: LEGAL DRUGS: THE ONLY ROUTE TO ENDING MEXICAN VIOLENCE
Pubdate: Sun, 08 Mar 2009
Source: East Valley Tribune (AZ)
Copyright: 2009 East Valley Tribune.
Author: Steven Greenhut
When it comes to foreign affairs, Americans are used to debating
progress or setbacks in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, or on the
Israeli invasion last month of the Gaza Strip.
We're used to thinking about death and destruction thousands of
miles from home and, as a result, tend to debate these matters based
more on glancing impressions, quick reads of newspapers and Web
sites and sound bites rather than personal knowledge or the
knowledge of those who live in the countries at issue.
What if I mentioned that thousands of people have been killed -
7,337 at last count - since 2007 in open warfare just a short drive
from here? Or that the grisly violence has reached close to areas
within the readership of this newspaper? What if I noted that the
violence has altered the lives of many of our neighbors, friends and
co-workers, who have family members who dwell in the heart of the
war zone? What if I added that, because of this war, we place our
lives in jeopardy by simply visiting some of our favorite vacation
spots? Would that cause you to think twice about your foreign-policy
priorities?
I am referring, of course, to Mexico, which has turned into a horror
show in the past couple of years. There's been sporadic news
coverage of these events. But the average American - and the average
politician, for that matter - doesn't seem attuned or interested in
a human tragedy that's starting to spill not just across the border,
but deeply into the American interior.
I still receive many phone calls and e-mails from readers upset
about the "Mexican" situation, but they aren't talking about the
beheadings, murders, kidnappings, assassinations of newspaper
editors, gunfights in town squares between drug lords and the
military, killings of bystanders and children, or about the huge
numbers of Mexican police who work for the cartels.
No, they are referring to the immigration situation, and they
generally are upset at the number of Mexican nationals who come
north mainly to escape grueling poverty. But, as former House
Speaker Newt Gingrich pointed out at a recent speech to an Orange
County, Calif., trade association, there isn't a wall big enough to
keep out the nasty problems now destroying Mexico. Americans need to
think more broadly about this matter. Since hearing Gingrich, I've
been reading about, and fuming over, these horrors.
American policy - in particular, the federal government's insistence
on funding and fighting a drug war here and in pushing the Mexican
government to battle the drug cartels down south - has exacerbated
the carnage in Mexico.
[snip]
Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09/n280/a08.html
=======================================================================
Law Enforcement & Prisons
-------------------------
COMMENT: (9-12)
Our first two stories this week illustrate contrasting attitudes
toward drug policy in the press. Both stories are about former star
athletes who got caught up in the criminal justice system through
selling relatively small amounts of drugs. But one story highlights
viewpoints that suggest the initial sentence was unjust, while the
other story suggests that the only injustice is that the convict was
released early. Elsewhere in the U.S., a big drug operation has
allegedly infiltrated another small town. And in Ireland, drug
cartels may have infiltrated Garda.
===
(9) NEW LOOK AT SENTENCING GUIDELINES FOR COCAINE
Pubdate: Sun, 8 Mar 2009
Source: San Francisco Chronicle (CA)
Copyright: 2009 Hearst Communications Inc.
Author: Claire Cooper
Willie Mays Aikens has returned to Kansas City, where he's still a
star. He's worked in construction and hopes to land a job with Major
League Baseball, maybe as a counselor, he says, "talking to people
about what drugs can do to a person."
People in Kansas City still talk about Aikens' four home runs for
the Royals in the 1980 World Series. They seem ready to forgive the
crack cocaine bust that earned him a 16-year prison term.
"It takes a big man to step back into the limelight after such a
dark path," wrote one blogger.
Aikens' path was dark indeed, but not because his crime was large.
The drug sale that sent him to prison was 64 grams, about a quarter
cup. The federal cocaine sentencing statutes treat that much crack
the same as a bucket of cocaine powder, the material from which
crack is produced.
Aikens' case exemplifies all that's gone wrong because of these
federal sentencing laws: The focus on petty crimes. The distortion
of priorities in the war on drugs. The lopsided impact on African
Americans - the 83 percent of federal crack defendants who are
black, though a federal health survey found most crack users are
white.
The problems have been documented for years. Now it's time for a
change.
Finally, key congressional members seem to be in a negotiating mood,
and the Obama administration wants the crack/powder disparity
eliminated. In the last session of Congress, then-Sen. Barack Obama
co-sponsored a bill introduced by then-Sen. Joe Biden to do just
that.
The same bill is on the table again. HR 265, introduced in the House
by Texas Democrat Sheila Jackson Lee, would increase federal
penalties for big-time trafficking while reducing them for
possession or dealing in trivial quantities of crack - offenses that
should be left to state prosecutors or public health officials.
[snip]
Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09/n279/a03.html
===
(10) PROSECUTOR: EX-MSU FOOTBALL STAR'S RELEASE FROM PRISON RAISES
CONCERNS
Pubdate: Sun, 08 Mar 2009
Source: Starkville Daily News (MS)
Copyright: Starkville Daily News 2009
Author: Brian Hawkins
The scheduled release of a former Mississippi State football player
from prison this week has local prosecutors voicing renewed concerns
about the inadequacies of the state's correctional system.
Dontay Walker, 29, is scheduled to be released from a Mississippi
Department of Corrections facility on Tuesday after serving four
years of a 25-year sentence for his 2005 conviction on charges of
possession of more than an ounce of marijuana and possession of more
than an ounce of crack cocaine.
Walker, according to a letter sent by fax from MDOC officials to
Judge Jim Kitchens, the District Attorney's Office and Starkville
and Oktibbeha County authorities, will be placed under house arrest.
The decision has prosecutors in the District Attorney's Office
unhappy.
"Apparently there's nothing we can do about it," said Assistant
District Attorney Frank Clark, who prosecuted Walker.
"It's getting to the point of being absurd. The penitentiary is
getting to be like the car dealer that advertises on TV - 'We're
turnin' 'em loose' - because that's all they seem to be doing these
days. It doesn't matter what the judge sentences somebody to serve,
the penitentiary is going to let them go whenever they're ready,"
Clark said.
Walker, a starting running back for the MSU football team until he
left the team late in the 2002 season, and another man were arrested
on Aug. 28, 2003, after Oktibbeha County sheriff's deputies and
Starkville police officers recovered felony amounts of crack cocaine
and marijuana, various drug packaging paraphernalia from the gray
1980s model Chevrolet Caprice in which the two had been traveling.
[snip]
Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09/n281/a06.html
====
(11) DRUG ARRESTS SHOCK LINDEN'S RESIDENTS
Pubdate: Sun, 08 Mar 2009
Source: Fayetteville Observer (NC)
Copyright: 2009 Fayetteville Observer
Author: Drew Brooks
LINDEN - Gossip has a way of channeling through the Heads of State
Hair Salon on Main Street.
This month, the hot topic is drugs. On Feb. 26, agents from the
Cumberland County Bureau of Narcotics arrested 10 people on the
outskirts of this small town on the county's northeastern edge. The
arrests came six months into an investigation of drug-related crime
in the area. Agents seized marijuana, cocaine, prescription drugs,
money and weapons during a search of six homes.
The arrests have caused shock and disbelief in Linden, where 132
people live. "It hits close to home," said Dana Byrd, a stylist at
the salon. Byrd said many of her customers know those arrested or
their families. Because of those relationships, some residents
declined to talk beyond calling the situation "scary" or expressing
disbelief. "It is a little shocking," Byrd said. "But when everybody
knows everybody, you can't keep that quiet." The arrests are
particularly disturbing because Linden is such a small and rural
town.
Visitors driving in from the west are greeted by a cemetery and
several churches. Main Street is little more than a post office,
town hall, a volunteer fire department and a mixed bag of homes,
farmland and businesses. Linden's churches dominate the landscape as
the largest buildings in town, aside from an abandoned brick
schoolhouse.
Pastor Wayne T. Bone of Linden First Baptist Church said the town
has for the most part stayed true to the "old-timey core values"
that once covered the Bible Belt.
[snip]
Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09/n280/a09.html
===
(12) OMBUDSMAN WIDENS PROBE INTO GARDA DRUG COLLUSION
Pubdate: Sun, 08 Mar 2009
Source: Sunday Times (UK)
Copyright: 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
Author: John Mooney
Suspicion Grows That Heroin Dealer Was 'Permitted' To Import Hard
Drugs
The Garda Siochana Ombudsman Commission ( GSOC ) is examining scores
of drug seizures, arrests and covert operations involving Kieran
Boylan, a convicted heroin dealer whose relationship with the force
is the subject of a collusion inquiry following an expose by The
Sunday Times.
The garda ombudsman now suspects that Boylan was "permitted" to
import huge quantities of heroin, cocaine and cannabis, which he
supplied to low-level dealers, who were later arrested, while he
continued to wholesale drugs to other criminal gangs.
The scope of the GSOC inquiry has been extended to examine other
startling claims, among them allegations that gardai informed Boylan
that he was being targeted by other garda units. Personal details on
gardai were also leaked to the criminal.
The disclosure has prompted calls for Fachtna Murphy, the garda
commissioner, to stand down an internal inquiry he set up to examine
Boylan's relationship with members of the force.
[snip]
Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09/n283/a02.html
=======================================================================
Cannabis & Hemp-
---------------------------
COMMENT: (13-16)
President Obama appointed his drug czar last week, but it remains to
be seen who will direct the DEA. If the DEA follows Obama's lead,
and begins to base policies on evidence and science rather than
intuition and ideology, then perhaps, in addition to halting their
raids on cannabis dispensaries, the DEA will stop obstructing
industrial hemp and medicinal cannabis research.
But just in case you were beginning to wonder if the truth would
finally prevail, and cannabis activists could move on to other
pressing matters, there are still a few die-hard prohibitionists,
such as Kevin A. Sabet, begging for more public humiliation. Keep
writing those LTEs!
===
(13) U.S. SHOULD LIFT BAN ON HEMP
Pubdate: Sat, 7 Mar 2009
Source: Athens Banner-Herald (GA)
Copyright: 2009 Athens Newspapers Inc
Author: Froma Harrop
When a pizzeria closes, the pizzeria down the block usually sees a
surge in business. That principle applies to commerce in the larger
North American neighborhood. Whenever the United States locks the gate
on a plausible economic activity, Canadians move in and profit.
The Bush administration's hostility toward stem-cell science created
opportunity in Canada. Starved of adequate federal support, American
labs doing this cutting-edge science shrank or closed down, and many
of their researchers moved to Canada. Between 2002 and 2007, the
number of American university professors and assistants relocating to
Canada jumped 27 percent. Some were stars in stem-cell research.
The Obama administration has reversed the Bush policy. Canadians now
fear they might suffer their own brain-drain back to the United
States. A recent headline from Toronto's Globe and Mail says it all:
"As U.S. emerges from Dark Age, Canada's scientific edge fades."
Hemp is a plant used to make paper, oils, textiles and other products.
But because hemp is related to marijuana, the U.S. government outlawed
its cultivation in the '50s. Now get this: American manufacturers are
free to import hemp fibers, oil and seed from other countries. For
example, U.S. carmakers use hemp inside door panels and for insulation
in seats.
Industrial hemp doesn't contain enough THC (the euphoric agent in
marijuana) to get anyone high, but that hasn't stopped the Drug
Enforcement Administration from sending out helicopters to scour the
land for hemp plants growing wild in ditches.
[snip]
Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09.n276.a03.html
===
(14) CALIFORNIA MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES CHEER U.S. SHIFT ON RAIDS
Pubdate: Mon, 9 Mar 2009
Source: Wall Street Journal (US)
Copyright: 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/487
Authors: Stu Woo and Justin Scheck
SAN FRANCISCO -- U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder's announcement that
the federal government will no longer raid medical-marijuana
dispensaries was cheered by California dealers as well as state
legislators who seek to legalize and tax sales of the drug.
Under the Bush administration, the Drug Enforcement Agency raided
dispensaries across the country. Such seizures were especially common
in California, which in 1996 became the first state to legalize
marijuana sales to people with doctor's prescriptions -- in opposition
to federal laws banning any use of the drug.
The attorney general signaled recently that states will be able to set
their own medical-marijuana laws, which President Barack Obama said
during his campaign that he supported. What Mr. Obama said then "is
now American policy," Mr. Holder said.
"We may be seeing the end of an era," said Rob MacCoun, a law
professor who studies drug policy at the University of California,
Berkeley. "It's not likely to be a priority for the Obama
administration."
That news relieved Kevin Reed, who owns the Green Cross, a medical-
marijuana-delivery service in San Francisco. He said he wasn't too
concerned about raids because they usually target large dispensaries
that "get out of control" with high traffic and cash flow. But federal
seizures were constantly "in the back of your head," Mr. Reed said.
Mr. MacCoun said the Obama administration's stance may help to
legitimize a "quasi-legal" marijuana culture in California. The state
has as many as 200,000 medical-marijuana users, the most out of the 13
states that allow such use of the drug.
[snip]
Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09.n282.a07.html
===
(15) PUTTING POT UNDER THE MICROSCOPE
Pubdate: Tue, 10 Mar 2009
Source: Los Angeles Times (CA)
Copyright: 2009 Los Angeles Times
The attorney general should heed calls to end the DEA's obstruction of
serious research into the medicinal value of marijuana.
At the heart of the debate about marijuana's medicinal value is a
dearth of academic research into its therapeutic properties. For 40
years, the federal government has frustrated such study by restricting
cultivation of marijuana for research to a single source, the
University of Mississippi. Most recently, the Bush administration
denied the application of a well-regarded botanist at the University
of Massachusetts to establish another cultivation facility, despite a
ruling by an administrative law judge determining that it should go
forward.
For eight years, professor Lyle Craker has struggled to obtain a
license from the Drug Enforcement Administration to grow research-
grade cannabis. His proposal is to supply marijuana to DEA-approved
researchers who have undergone a rigorous review and approval process
by the U.S. Public Health Service, and whose protocols have been
approved by the Food and Drug Administration. The DEA, however, has
behaved as if this serious scientist wants to start a backyard plot
for campus parties.
In February 2007, after nine days of testimony from expert witnesses
and administration officials, light broke through the DEA's
bureaucratic murk: Administrative Law Judge Mary Ellen Bittner issued
an 87-page opinion saying that the supply of marijuana from the
University of Mississippi is insufficient in quality and quantity and
that Craker's project should go forward. In a case study of
governmental intransigence, the DEA dithered for two years. Then, a
few days before the Obama administration took power, acting
Administrator Michele Leonhart issued a final order denying Craker's
application.
Members of Congress have urged Atty. Gen. Eric H. Holder Jr. to amend
or overrule the order, and he should do so. Then he should go further
and change the culture of the agency. Instead of thwarting the
advancement of science, the DEA should encourage cannabis research. As
California and the U.S. government continue to debate the future of
medical marijuana, what we need is a body of work on the drug's
efficacy in treating a variety of illnesses and conditions. Instead,
we have a collection of small studies and individual testimony. On
Monday, President Obama signed a "scientific integrity presidential
memorandum" and promised that his administration would base its public
policies on science, not politics; the DEA is one of many federal
agencies ready for enlightenment.
URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09.n289.a08.html
===
(16) CALIFORNIA CAN'T AFFORD TO LEGALIZE MARIJUANA
Pubdate: Sun, 8 Mar 2009
Source: San Jose Mercury News (CA)
Copyright: 2009 San Jose Mercury News
Author: Kevin A. Sabet
Referenced: AB390 http://drugsense.org/url/gwVcxxaW
It's a tempting idea: Legalize and tax a commodity that a lot of
people like, collect the revenue, and reap the budgetary benefits. In
economic times like these, that might be just the formula we need to
pull us out of the red. In this case, the truth does not live up to
the hype.
Legalizing marijuana will not solve our budget woes, nor will it be
good for public health. Introducing marijuana into the open market is
very likely to do some other things, however: increase the drug's
consumption, and with it, the enormous social costs associated with
marijuana-related accidents, illness and productivity loss.
The example of legal alcohol and tobacco reveal an unsettling pattern.
Legal drugs are by definition easy to obtain, and commercialization
glamorizes their use and furthers their social acceptance. Their price
is low, and high profits make promotion worthwhile for sellers.
Addiction is simply the price of doing business. Any revenue gained
from taxing these drugs is quickly offset by the heavy costs
associated with their increased prevalence. Because today's high-
potency marijuana is much more harmful than once thought, a spike in
use from legalization would result in a financial burden California
cannot afford to bear.
It is almost universally accepted in the medical community that
marijuana use is linked with mental illness. Since the appearance of
the British Medical Journal's famous 2002 headline, "Marijuana and
psychiatric illness: the link grows stronger," the research showing
marijuana's link with illnesses like psychosis and schizophrenia has
become frighteningly commonplace. In fact, researchers from King's
College in London have shown that eliminating marijuana use would
decrease the incidence of schizophrenia in the American population by
more than 8 percent.
[snip]
Note: Kevin A. Sabet, a senior drug policy adviser in the Clinton and
Bush administrations, is a native of Anaheim. He wrote this article
for the Mercury News.
Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09.n276.a10.html
=======================================================================
International News
---------------------------
COMMENT: (17-21)
The UN summit on drugs policy in Vienna, Austria was held this week,
ten years after the 1998 UN prohibition summit was held, promising,
"A Drug-Free World" in which government force (police weapons,
arrests, prison) would eliminate or significantly reduce cannabis,
cocaine, and opium by 2008. While little has changed in illegal drug
usage or availability over the last ten years, governments worldwide
remain enchanted as ever with the failed policy of prohibition.
Evo Morales, president of Bolivia and former coca farmer, surprised
delegates at the UN summit by eating a coca leaf during a speech.
"This is coca leaf, this is not cocaine, this is part and parcel of
a culture." Morales argued that coca should be legal for medicine
and food.
A cogent analysis by Ed Howker of the UN summit appeared in the UK
Independent newspaper. "So, why did we lose the drugs war? The
answer is simple economics. Demand will find a supply... [O]ur
nations are addicted to a policy which is ruining the lives of their
own people while enslaving the peoples of others... Like any addict,
their first step should be to admit to themselves that they have the
problem."
In Canada, amidst a saturation barrage of media coverage repeatedly
asserting recent shootings were "drug related", the right-wing
minority conservative Harper government has re-introduced
legislation which conflates gang violence (of which there is little
in Canada) with marijuana "crimes" (of which there is much in
Canada). The move, while widening the net for planned for-profit
prisons, also plays to the Conservatives' "law and order" and "tough
on drugs" themes, believed to be popular with Conservative party
voters. Ironically, most people in British Columbia, while saying
they support a crackdown on "gangs", at the same time support the
outright "legalization" of cannabis, according to an Angus Reid poll
released this week.
We leave you this week with a piece from Dan Gardner in the Canadian
Victoria Times-Colonist newspaper, which related the research of
Harvard University economist Jeffrey Miron. "[T]he hypothesis that
drug prohibition generates violence is generally consistent with the
long time-series and cross-country facts." Read that again. "[D]rug
prohibition generates violence". To police and others irked with
columnist Dan Gardner for such drug-war heresy ("the police are sick
of me writing that their hard work is worse than useless"), Gardner
offers a challenge: form a new commission and honestly look at the
evidence.
===
(17) THIS IS A COCA LEAF, NOT COCAINE, INSISTS MORALES
Pubdate: Thu, 12 Mar 2009
Source: Independent (UK)
Copyright: 2009 Independent Newspapers (UK) Ltd.
Author: Toby Green
Evo Morales, the Bolivian leader, ate a coca leaf in front of
delegates at the UN summit on drugs yesterday, to underline his
demand that the raw ingredient of cocaine should be allowed for
medicinal and other uses.
President Morales, a former peasant coca farmer, brandished the leaf
during an impassioned speech, saying: "This is coca leaf, this is
not cocaine, this is part and parcel of a culture." He told
ministers that the ban on coca was a "major historical mistake".
He added: "It has no harmful impact, no harmful impact at all in its
natural state. It causes no mental disturbances, it does not make
people run mad, as some would have us believe, and it does not cause
addiction."
[snip]
Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09.n295.a03.html
===
(18) WE CAN'T GO ON PROHIBITING DRUGS!
Pubdate: Monday 9 March 2009
Source: Independent (UK)
Copyright: 2009 Independent Newspapers (UK) Ltd.
Author: Ed Howker
Our policy is based on the belief that the war against drugs is
winnable. It is not
[snip]
This is called evidence-based analysis and the sooner international
policy makers get their head around it the better. The UN hoped to
achieve their goals by "eliminating or significantly reducing" the
production of opium, cocaine and cannabis by 2008. Well, here we
are, so let's see how they have been getting on. Today the UN places
a value on the international drugs trade at around $320bn (UKP
227bn) a year - that's more than twice the annual budget of the
European Union - - while the U.S. spends $40bn in fighting it. We
are hopelessly out-gunned.
Since 1998 we've read a Downing Street strategy memo which admitted
that the UK government seizes less than 20 per cent of the hundreds
of tonnes of cocaine and heroin that enters our country, and that to
make trafficking unprofitable would require us to capture 80 per
cent - a plain impossibility.
So, why did we lose the drugs war? The answer is simple economics.
Demand will find a supply.
[snip]
Instead we have an international drug mafia more powerful and
wealthy than any organised criminals in the history of human
society. They are the beneficiaries of the alchemy of prohibition
which turns virtually worthless crops into a commodity worth its
weight in gold. And, unsurprisingly when the product is so valuable,
they will stop at nothing, literally nothing, to get it to market
and realise the profit. If you were not stung by the banking crisis
and are still looking for a justification for market regulation,
this is it. The results are all around us.
[snip]
Before the last UN convention more than 100 political and community
leaders, including the current Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan
Williams, wrote to the UN Secretary General to call for an open,
honest and rational debate about drugs. Last week, this plea was
repeated by 26 peers, who seek the immediate creation of an
intergovernmental panel to do the same. They perceive, rightly, that
our nations are addicted to a policy which is ruining the lives of
their own people while enslaving the peoples of others.
Tomorrow, in Vienna, the UN has another opportunity to stage an
intervention. Like any addict, their first step should be to admit
to themselves that they have the problem.
Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09.n291.a08.html
===
(19) POLL FINDS MOST BACK LEGAL POT, GANG CRACKDOWN
Pubdate: Wed, 11 Mar 2009
Source: Surrey Leader (CN BC)
Copyright: 2009 Surrey Leader
Author: Jeff Nagel
A new poll shows B.C. residents strongly support a series of
proposed justice reforms to curb gang activity and nearly two-thirds
also back the legalization of marijuana.
Angus Reid Strategies surveyed Canadians across the country and
found at least 95 per cent of the B.C. respondents back mandatory
minimum sentences for serious drug crime like drive-by shootings and
designating gang-related homicide first-degree murder.
Those proposed changes are being spearheaded by the federal
Conservative government.
[snip]
B.C. was the province most likely to back legalization of marijuana
- 64 per cent of respondents support the idea, compared to 50 per
cent nationally.
Two-thirds of B.C. respondents also said the federal government
should not eliminate harm reduction programs such as supervised
injection sites and needle exchanges.
A majority from B.C. (53 per cent) said the federal
Tories shouldn't have scrapped the marijuana
decriminalization legislation previously introduced by
the Liberals.
[snip]
Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09.n297.a05.html
===
(20) OTTAWA FOLLOWS U.S.-STYLE APPROACH IN WAR ON DRUGS
Pubdate: Sat, 07 Mar 2009
Source: Maple Ridge News (CN BC)
Copyright: 2009 Maple Ridge News
Author: Phil Melnychuk
While bullets continue to fly and bodies fall, the federal
government is trying again to make jail time mandatory for drug
crimes.
[snip]
"We need to take action and impose stronger penalties so that there
is a real deterrent to people who get involved with gangs, and with
drugs."
The government has re-introduced a bill that would amend the
Controlled Drugs and Substances Act to ensure drug producers and
pushers serve time if convicted.
The specifics include:
. one-year in jail for dealing drugs such as marijuana, when carried
out for organized crime purposes or when a weapon or violence is
involved;
[snip]
Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09.n278.a05.html
===
(21) HOW TO MAKE ME SHUT UP ABOUT LEGALIZING DRUGS
Pubdate: Tue, 10 Mar 2009
Source: Victoria Times-Colonist (CN BC)
Copyright: 2009 Times Colonist
Author: Dan Gardner
[snip]
Jeffrey Miron, an economist at Harvard University, has been studying
the drug trade for 15 years. He stresses that "drug-related
violence" has little to do with drugs.
Prohibition of "any commodity for which there's demand leads to
violence because the market is driven underground," he said in an
interview. "It has relatively little to do with the commodity that
is prohibited. It has almost everything to do with the fact that if
you make it illegal, people are going to resolve their disputes with
violence, not lawyers.
"If we banned coffee, we'd have a huge black market in coffee." And
thugs in the coffee trade would be blasting away at each other.
[snip]
Examining data spanning countries and decades, Miron and his
colleagues found things like arrest rates, capital punishment and
gun laws didn't explain the numbers.
But "the hypothesis that drug prohibition generates violence," they
concluded, "is generally consistent with the long time-series and
cross-country facts."
Miron's conclusion is sobering: If governments respond to gang
violence with tougher laws and crackdowns, they will ultimately
produce more violence.
[snip]
The best way to make a significant, lasting reduction in gang
violence, Miron contends, is to remove drugs from the black market.
They can be strictly regulated using any of a hundred different
policy models. But they must be legalized.
[snip]
Look, I know the police are sick of me writing that their hard work
is worse than useless. To be honest, I'm sick of writing it, too.
[snip]
So let's have a commission of inquiry that can gather the best
evidence from all over the world, analyze it properly and draw
conclusions without regard to political expediency.
Let the evidence decide. If the police and other supporters of the
status quo are confident they are right, they should welcome an
inquiry as a chance to silence the critics.
In fact, that's the deal I'm offering. Call for the creation of an
inquiry. Demand wide terms of reference, a serious research budget
and a respected voice to lead it.
Do that and I'll shut up.
Continues: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09.n290.a01.html
***********************************************************************
HOT OFF THE 'NET
-------------------------------
FEARÂ PREVAILSÂ ATÂ THEÂ UNÂ AS VOICES FOR DRUG LAW REFORM ARE SMEARED
The effect has been to stifle critics of the status quo, and make a
rational and mature exploration of alternative approaches into a
political no-go area, by inaccurately and offensively portraying
advocates of change as `pro-drug'.
http://drugsense.org/url/oF7LusEk
===
POLICE DETECTIVE SAYS LEGALIZE DRUGS TO STOP GANGS
Retired police detective Howard Wooldridge says we can hurt gangs and
cartels by legalizing and regulating all drugs after spending years
fighting on the front lines of the "war on drugs."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6UpqmGC2dM
===
THE PRESIDENT AND THE DRUG WAR: PART I
By Al Giordano
http://narcosphere.narconews.com/thefield/president-and-drug-war-part-i
===
OBAMA'S DRUG POLICY
By John Tierney
Which way is the Obama administration heading in dealing with illicit
drugs? It depends which speaker you heeded at Wednesday's ceremony
announcing that Gil Kerlikowske, the Seattle police chief, will become
the White House's new drug czar.
http://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/12/obamas-drug-policy/
===
LAWYERS FOR PROF. CRAKER SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO THE DEA
On March 11, 2009, lawyers for Prof. Craker submitted a powerful
Supplemental Motion To Reconsider and Exhibits to DEA Deputy
Administrator Michelle Leonhart, adding to a Motion to Reconsider
filed January 30.
http://www.maps.org/
===
MEETING IN VIENNA
UN Commission on Narcotics Drugs Prepares to Head Further Down Same
Prohibitionist Path, But Dissenting Voices Grow Louder
Drug War Chronicle, Issue #576, 3/13/09
http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/576/UN_CND_UNGASS_Vienna_NGOs
===
BRUCE MIRKEN ON THE RACHEL MADDOW SHOW
MPP Director of Communications Bruce Mirken discusses marijuana policy
and the new drug czar, Gil Kerlikowske, with Rachel Maddow.
http://tv.mpp.org/news/bruce-mirken-on-the-rachel-maddow-show-03112009/
===
DRUG TRUTH NETWORK
Century of Lies - 03/10/09 - Bruce Mirken
Time For YOU To Get Involved: Bruce Mirken of Marijuana Policy Project,
Matt Simon of New Hampshire medical marijuana effort, Stephen Betzer
of Texas' effort, editorial from Coleen McCool, UK's Guardian on
Colombian coca & report on Australia's chopper raids on marijuana.
http://www.drugtruth.net/cms/?q=node/2329
Cultural Baggage Radio Show - 03/11/09 - Charles Lynch
Charles Lynch, cannabis dispensary operator aligned with the mayor and
chamber of commerce now facing 5 years in federal prison & Cheryl
Aichele, ally of Mr. Lynch + Doug McVay with Drug War Facts, Terry
Nelson of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition & a DTN Editorial
http://www.drugtruth.net/cms/?q=node/2330
===
OBAMA SIGNALS READINESS TO FURTHER MILITARIZE DRUG WAR
With Potential Deployment of National Guard to Mexico Border
President Obama is considering deploying National Guard troops along
the border with Mexico in response to the escalating drug war.
http://drugsense.org/url/rN9hB72p
===
"MAYBE MARIJUANA SHOULD BE LEGALIZED & REGULATED" CONGRESSWOMAN SANCHEZ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6t6r8BpjP_c
===
CANNABIDIOL NOW!
By Fred Gardner
Two plants strains relatively rich in cannabidiol (CBD) have been
identified by an analytic test lab recently established to serve the
medical cannabis industry in California. That's two major stories in
one sentence. Let's take it from the bottom.
http://counterpunch.org/gardner03132009.html
***********************************************************************
WHAT YOU CAN DO THIS WEEK
--------------------------------------------------
AL ROKER REPORTING: MARIJUANA INC.
"Al Roker Reporting: Marijuana Inc.," premieres this Sunday at 10 PM
ET. In this edition of "Al Roker Reporting," Al takes an in-depth look
at the nation's most used illicit drug. California is one of the 13
states that has decriminalized marijuana for medical use. Here, Al
visits the "Farmacy," which is one of the state's many distributors of
medical marijuana.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036750/
===
STAYING ALIVE
CBC's The Fifth Estate
Friday, March 13, 2009 at 9 p.m.EST ( 6pm PST)
The federal government wants it shut down. The people who use it and
who work there say it is saving lives. It is Insite, provincially-
funded, and the first and only supervised injection site in North
America where addicts can bring their drug of choice and, with the
clean needles provided, can inject themselves. Follow Hana Gartner
inside and make up your own mind about whether Insite is, as one
federal politician has said, an "abomination", or whether there
should be more of them in this country.
http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/
***********************************************************************
LETTER OF THE WEEK
------------------------------------
LEGALIZE DRUGS AND GANGS WILL GO AWAY
By Travis Erbacher
Editor:
Stephen Harper's visit to Vancouver on Thursday, Feb. 26 was highly
disturbing. Mr. Harper's Conservative party wants to re-introduce
previously expired legislation, which would increase the penalty for
growing one marijuana plant to a mandatory minimum sentence of six
months in prison, as well as increasing penalties for other drug
offences.
The way that Mr.Harper has decided to do this, very
opportunistically, has been to slide it under reasonable legislation
which would increase gang-related murders to a first-degree murder
charge. This is dishonest politics. It is also guaranteed to fail.
When alcohol prohibition was in effect, many people died from impure
homemade alcohol, and innocent people were shot down in the streets
over territorial disputes. Does this sound familiar? That was nearly
a century ago.
Prohibition of any substance increases prices, reduces purity
causing accidental deaths, and increases the violence of gang
rivalries, due to higher sums of money being involved. Even with a
century of data to show that prohibition is a failed policy, Mr.
Harper wants to move us further in the wrong direction.
Want a real solution? Legalize all drugs. Put the gangs out of
business. Politicians who support prohibition are guaranteeing gangs
in B.C. increasingly high profit margins from drug sales, as well as
a monopoly on the drug trade. If there was no money in the drug
trade, there would be nothing to fight over, and there would be no
more innocent deaths.
Until that happens, the blood of innocents will be on all of our
hands. Hopefully, before it's too late, this fact will weigh heavily
on all of our minds, and finally, after a century of failed drug
policy and unnecessary deaths, we will do the right thing.
Travis Erbacher
Langley
Pubdate: Fri, 06 Mar 2009
Source: Langley Times (CN BC)
Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09.n242.a08.html
***********************************************************************
LETTER WRITER OF THE MONTH - FEBRUARY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
DrugSense recognizes Dan Linn of Sycamore, Illinois for his six
published letters during February, which brings his total published
letters that we know of to 42. Dan is the Executive Director of the
Illinois Chapter of NORML http://www.illinoisnorml.org/ A volunteer
MAP newshawk and editor, Dan manages the selection process for the
Letter Of The Week http://www.mapinc.org/lte_awards/weekly.php#how
You may read his published letters at:
http://mapinc.org/writer/Linn+Dan
***********************************************************************
FEATURE ARTICLE
-------------------------------
The Drug War Is Not A Failure
By Pete Guither
People often talk about the drug war being a failure, and, in fact,
three quarters of the voting public believe the drug war is a
failure ( see http://drugsense.org/url/0yANLUu7 ).
I've said it myself.
But it's really not a good description, and calling it a failure
doesn't do what we need to motivate the public to care enough about
reform.
You see, the word "failure" conjures up images of merely not
succeeding. We often think of it like grades in school. A failure is
someone who didn't apply himself, or failed to do the necessary
things to "pass." It implies that there could be a path that would
result in "success" if only more effort was given, or a different
approach.
By calling the drug war a failure, we're treating it like some kid
getting an "F" in chemistry because he slept through too many
classes, when in fact it's more like the kid blew up the chemistry
building and released toxic chemicals into the drinking water.
That's not a failure to accomplish something. That is accomplishing
something very, very bad.
We need to remind people that, yes, the drug war has failed to
accomplish any of its stated goals, but the drug war is not a
failure.
It is the problem.
Pete Guither is the author of Drug WarRant, http:/www.drugwarrant.com/
a weblog at the front lines of the drug war, where this piece was
first presented.
***********************************************************************
QUOTE OF THE WEEK
------------------------------------
"The entire American media apparatus bought into the drug war -
which is an enormously damaging and costly undertaking for this
country - and there wasn't enough critical reporting about it and
that's why it's gotten out of hand." -David Talbot
***********************************************************************
DS Weekly is one of the many free educational services DrugSense
offers our members. Watch this feature to learn more about what
DrugSense can do for you.
TO SUBSCRIBE, UNSUBSCRIBE, OR UPDATE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS:
Please utilize the following URLs
http://www.drugsense.org/hurry.htm
http://www.drugsense.org/unsub.htm
CREDITS:
Policy and Law Enforcement/Prison content selection and analysis by
Stephen Young (
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
), This Just In selection by
Richard Lake (
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
) and Stephen Young, International
content selection and analysis by Doug Snead (
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
),
Cannabis/Hemp content selection and analysis, Hot Off The Net
selection and Layout by Matt Elrod (
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
).
Analysis comments represent the personal views of editors, not
necessarily the views of DrugSense.
We wish to thank all our contributors, editors, NewsHawks and letter
writing activists. Please help us help reform. Become a NewsHawk See
http://www.mapinc.org/hawk.htm for info on contributing clippings.
===
NOTICE:
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and
educational purposes.
===
MAKE A TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION TO DRUGSENSE ON-LINE
http://www.drugsense.org/donate.htm
-OR-
Mail in your contribution. Make checks payable to MAP Inc. send your
contribution to:
The Media Awareness Project (MAP) Inc.
D/B/a DrugSense
14252 Culver Drive #328
Irvine, CA, 92604-0326
(800) 266 5759
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
|