References
Alcohol Beverage Control Adnunist} tion. 1973. Dcenshg and Enforecnmnt (revised and up-d ted by B.W. Corrado). Washington: loint Cornmittee of the States to Study Alcoholic Beverages Laws.
Allen, F.L. 1931. Only Yesterday: An Infonnal History of the 1920s. New York: Harper.
Allsop, K. 1961. ThcSootieggerand TheirEra. London: Hutchinson.
Baron, S. 1962. Brewed in America: A History of Beer and Ale in the United States. Boston:
Litfle Brown.
Beauchanp, D. 1981. Bcyond Alcoholism. Akohol and Public Hcalth Policy. Philadelphia:
Ternple University Press.
Billings, J.S. 1905. Thc Liquor Problan. A Summa y of Investigations Conducted by thc Conenittcc of Fifty and thc Origins of Alcohol Controt Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Blocker, J. 1989. American Tcmperanec Movemcnts: Cycics of Rcfonn New York: Twane.
Brecher, E.M. 1972. Licit and Illicit Drugs. Boston: Little Brown.
Bruun, K., G. Edwards, M. Lurnio, et al. 197S. Alcohol Control in Public Hcalth Pcrspectivc.
Helsinki: Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies.
Burnhun, J.C 1968. New Perspectives on the Prohibition "Experiment" of the 1920s. Journal of Social History 2:51-G7.
C shman, S.D. 1981. Prohibihon the Lie of thc Land. New York: Free PTeSS.
Englesmann, E. 1990. The Pragrnatic Strategia of the Dutch "DTU8 Czar." In Drug Prohibiaon
and the Conscience of Nahons eds. A.S. Trebach and K. Zeese, 49-S5. Washington: DTug Policy Found tion.
Ev®eK A.S. 1978. Ru)n Across thc Border. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Fo dick, R.B. and A.L. Scott. 1933. roward Liquor Control. New York: Harper.
Galiber,J.L. 1990. A Bill to Reteal Crimial Drug Laws: Replacing Prohibition with Regula-
tion. Hofstra Law Review 18:831-80.
Garrison, W.E. 1933. Fitting the Law to the Lawless. Christian Ccntury 50: ISOS-6.
Gddstein, P., H. H. BrownsteiF, PJ. Ryan, nd P.A. B ellucci . 1 990. Most Drug-Related
Murders Result from Crack Sales, Nd Use. rhe Drug Policy Letter (April). Washington:
Drug Policy Foundation.
Goode, E. 1989. Drugs inAmerican Society. New Y®k: McEraw-Hill.
Gordon, E. 1943. rhe Wrecking of the 18th Amendment. Ftancestown, NH: Alcohol Informa-
tion Press.
Gulick, L. 1977. Letter to Richard S. Childs, copy to Laurence S. Rockefell®, in Rockefeller
Archives, May 2.
Gusfield, J.R 1986. Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Move-
ment 2nd ed. Urbana: University of Illinois
P~ 1968. Prohibition: The Impact of Political Utopianism. Changc and Continuity in 19ocn-
ticth Ccntury America eds. J. Braeman et al. Columbus: Ohio State Universiq Press.
IlaTTison, L.V., and E. Laine. 1936. Aftcr Repeal: A Shady of Liquor Control Administration.
New Yor~: Harper.
Henk, J.V. 1989. The Uneasy Decrimintllization: A Perspective on Dutch Drug Policy. Hofnra
LawReview 18:717-50.
HofJtra Law Rcview. 1990. A Symposium on Drug Decriminalization 18(3).
Jonas, S. 1990. Solving the DTU8 Problem: A Public Health Approach to the Reduction of the
Use and Abuse of bdh Legal and Illegal Reaeational Drugs. Hofstra Law Rcview.
18:7SI-93.
Kerr, J.A. 198S. Organiz,ed for Proh’bihon. A New History of the Anti Saloon League. New
Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Kobler, J. 1973. Ardent Spirits: Ehe Rise and FaU of Prohibition. New York: G. P. Putnam.
Kyvig, D.E. 1979. Repealing National Prohibition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Leuchtenburg, W.E. 19S8. rhe Pcril/s of Prosperity: 1914-1932. Chicago: University of Chi-
cago Press.
Levine, H.G. 1978. The Discovery of AMiction: Changing COn_ptioDs of Habitual DTunken
1. ness in America. Journal of Sh(dia on Alcohxl 39: 143-74. t - 1983. The Comminee of Ffflty and the Origins of Alcohol Control. Journal of Drug Issues 13:
95- 116.
1984. The Alcohol Problem in America: From Temperance to Prohibition. British Journal of Addietion 79: 109-19.
1985. The Birth of American Alcohol Control: Prohibition the Power Elite, and the Problem of Lawlessness. Contemporary Drug Problems 12:63-115.
Lyle, J.H. 1960. The Dry and Lawicss "ears. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-HaD.
Makelaa, K., R. Room, E. Single, et al. 1981. Aleohol Society and thc Statc. 1: A Comparatavc
Study of Alcohol Control. Toronto: Addiction Research Found tion.
Manchester, W. 1974. The Clory and the Dream. A Nal)ratrve History of Ameriea 1932-1972.
Boston: Little, Brown.
Mcrtz, C. 1970. Thc Dry Dceate. Seattle: University of Washington Pre".
Miron,J.A., andJ. Zweibel. 1991. Alcohol Consumption During Prohibition. American
Eeononue A5Joeiation Papers and Proceedings 81 :242-7. Moore, M., nd D.R. Gerstein. Eds. 1981. Alcohol and Publie Policy. Bcyond the Snadow of Proh’bition. W shington: National Academy Press.
Maqan, J. 1991. W s Alcohol Prohibition Good for the Nation’s Health? Working paper.
School of Medidne, City University of New York.
Murphy, S., D. Waldoff, and C. Reinannan. 1991. Drifting into Dealing: Becoming a Cocaine Seller. Qualitative Soeiology 13(4):321-43.
Muscatine, D., M. Amerine, and B. Thompstn. 1984. The University of California Book of California Winc. Berkeley: UDivenity of Califorah Preis. N delmann, E. 1989a. Drug Prohibition in the US: Costs, Consequences, and Alternatives.
Seicnsc 24S:939-47.
1989b. Response to Letters. Seicnec 24G:1102-3.
Odegard, P. 1928. Pressure Politics: The Story of the Anti-Saloon League. New York:
ColunXia University Press.
Piven, P.P., nd R. Clow rd. 1971. Regulating tne Poor: Thc Functions of Publie Wcifare. New York: Pantheon.
1977. Poor Pcople ‘s Movements. New York: Pantheon.
Reinarman, C., and H.G. Levine. 1989. Crack in Context: Politics and Media in the Making of
Drug Scare. Conten~porary Drug Problans 16:S3S-77.
Room, R.G.W. 1988. The Dialectic of Drinking in Australian Life: Prom the Rum Corps to the Wine Column. Awtralian Drug and Akohol Review 7:413-37.
Ror baugh, WJ. 1979. Thc Akohob’e Republie: An Sncrican Tradition. New York: OxfordUnivenity Press.
Ruirbarget, n. 1989. Profts, Power, and ProSbitionw Akohol Rcform and thc /ndwtrialeing of Ameriea, 180s1930. Albany: State University of New Y®k Press. Schmoke, K.L. 1990. An Argument in Pavor of Decriminalization. Hofstra Law Rcview 1 S S(}1 -2S.
Schuler, J.T., and A. McBride. 1990. Ndes From the Pront: A Dissidcat Law-Enforcement
Perspective OD Drug Prohibition. Hofstra Law Review 18(3):893-942.
Sheppard, Mrs. J.S. 1938. After Five Years, What Has Repeal Achieved? New York T - es Ma-gazine (December 4).
Shipman, G. 1,ø40. St te Administrative Machinery f® Liqu® Control. Iirw and Contem-porary Problems 7:600 20.
Sinclair, A. 1964. Era of Excess: A Social History of the Proh’bition Movement. New v York:Harper.
Single, E., P. Morgan, andJ. Dclint. Eds. 1981. Alcohol, Society, and the State. 2: The Social History of Control Policy in seven Countries. Toronto: Addiction Rescarch Poundation.
himberlakc, J.H. 1963. ProSbition ant the Progressive Movement, 1900-192R Cambridge,| M ss.: Harvard University Press.
Th®nton, M. 1991. Alcohol Prohibition Was a Pailure. Policy analysis report DO. IS7.W shiDgtoD: Cato Institute.
Trebach, A.S. 1989. ignoriU the Great Commission Reports. Thc Drug Policy Letter (Sept.-Oct.):S.
Treb ch, A S., and K.B. Zeese. Eds. 1990. Drug ProSh’tion ant the Conscience of Nation.Washington: Drug Policy Foundation.
Tyrol, 1. 1979. Sobering Up: FroK Temperanc,e to ProSh’tion in Antibilam America,1800-186E Westport, CODD.: Greenwood Press.
Waldorf, D., C. Reinarman, and S. Murphy. 1991. Cocaine Changes: The Experienee of Usingant Quitting. Philaddphia,, Pa: Ternple University Press.
Warburton, C. 1932. The Economic Results of Proh’bition. New Y®k: Colurnbia University[ Press.
1 Wickersham Commission National CommissiOn OD Law Observance a d Enforcement. 1931.
Report on Enforcement of the Proh’bition Lcrws of the United States. H.R 722, 71st CODgress, Ist Session. W shiuton.
Williams, T. 1989. Cocaine Kits: The Insite Story of a Teenage Drug Ring. Reading, Mass.:[ Addison-Wesley.
ZinbeJg, NE. 1984. Drug, Set, ant Scning: The Basis for Controllet Intoxicant Use. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Acknowledgment:
This article was first published in:
The Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 69, No. 3, 1991.